To content
Department of Spatial Planning

Research news and events

Raffael Beier gives lecture at the Institute of Sociology at the University of Tübingen

-
in
  • Forschung
  • Fachgebiet
Street with so-aclled 'Condominiums' in the suburb of Tulu Dimtu, part of the Addis Ababa metropolitan area in Ethiopia © Raffael Beier​/​TU Dortmund
So-called 'Condominiums' in Tulu Dimtu, Addis Ababa metropolitan area
As part of the G-TURN lecture series "Urbanities in a Global Perspective: Crises, Change, and Continuity", Raffael Beier will give a guest lecture on "The Missing People of State-subsidized Housing: Lived Experiences of Non-occupancy and Secondary Residential Mobility" at the Institute of Sociology at the University of Tübingen on 27 June 2024.

Abstract of the content of the guest lecture

In the context of the Millennium Development Goals, several observers have noted a renaissance of mass housing programmes in the Global South. At the same time, there are concerns that such large-scale standardised housing and resettlement programmes would repeat past mistakes and miss their target groups. Unaffordable schemes and maintenance, underserviced sites at inappropriate, distant locations, and gentrification or downward-raiding would provoke that much of the new, state-subsidized housing stock would actually not be occupied by those who policy stakeholders call the ‘intended beneficiaries’. These ‘missing people’ of state-subsidized housing and re-settlement programmes either have never inhabited their new housing units or vacated them after some time – but why do they leave and where do they go? Largely due to methodological challenges in finding resettled dwellers outside of resettlement sites, these questions have remained unanswered to date, hence provoking accusatory speculations and divergent assumptions. In my pre-sentation, I will shed light on the “missing people” of large-scale housing and resettlement programmes, conceptualizing departure from state-subsidized housing alongside a continuum of constraint and agency. Based on a qualitative, people-centred analysis of ‘housing pathways’ of the ‘missing people’, I argue that non-occupancy and secondary residential mobility can be understood as demand-driven practices of coping with and adapting to shortcomings of supply-driven housing policy, in terms of affordability, uniformity, and displacement. Whereas the extent of constraint and agency differs from forceful displacement to voluntary moving, the findings underline the contextual embeddedness of housing policy as well as the crucial significance of decent labour for people to sustain decent housing conditions – inside and outside state-subsidized housing.

Here you may find further information on the guest lecture and the G-TURN lecture series.